- Efficiency: Delegated legislation allows for quicker and more efficient decision-making than the traditional legislative process. This is because the authority to make rules and regulations is delegated to administrative bodies that are better equipped to deal with specific issues in a timely manner.
- Expertise: Delegated legislation allows for decisions to be made by subject matter experts who have a deep understanding of the issues at hand. This can result in better-informed decisions that are more likely to be effective.
- Flexibility: Delegated legislation allows for rules and regulations to be updated and revised more easily in response to changing circumstances or new information. This is because administrative bodies can make changes without having to go through the entire legislative process again.
- Accountability: Delegated legislation can be subject to judicial review, which provides a mechanism for ensuring that the administrative bodies responsible for making rules and regulations are held accountable for their decisions.
- Cost-effective: Delegated legislation can be less expensive than the traditional legislative process, as it requires fewer resources and less time.
- Local knowledge: Delegated legislation allows local bodies to make decisions that are tailored to their specific needs and circumstances. This can be particularly important in areas such as planning and development, where local knowledge is essential for effective decision-making.
Overall, delegated legislation can be a useful tool for making decisions quickly, efficiently, and with a greater degree of expertise and local knowledge. However, it is important to ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place to ensure accountability and transparency in the decision-making process.
